Federated Farmers’ election manifesto is 42 pages long.
I looked at the first 16 pages a couple of posts back, and continue from page 17:
* Employment legislation particularly the Employment Relations Act and Holiday Act, to be reviewed with a view to reducing compliance costs and encouraging labour market flexibility and productivity.
* The minimum wage retained at its current level (ie adjusted only for inflation).
* Paid parental leave to remain unchanged.
I agree with the first two points, but have philosophical difficulties with PPL because I don’t believe having a baby by itself is sufficient reason to require tax payer assistance. Giving money to a couple earning six-figure salaries when so many people are in desperate need of help shows the government has its priorities wrong.
* A robust efficient regulatory regime that provides assurances to consumers, both in New Zealand and overseas, of food safety.
* A continuation of voluntary country of origin food labelling.
Our reputation for producers of safe food must be maintained.
A growing number of consumers, and I’m one of them, want country of origin labelling (COOL) where practical but I think that should be driven by consumers. If we opt for COOL food the people who sell it will soon get the message but that doesn’t need government intervention.
* Recognition by the state that gene technology can provide benefits to New Zealand producers.
* Endorsement of individual farmers’ right to determine what technologies are used in their farming systems.
* Enshrining consumers’ right to information relating to the products they are purchasing by way of active risk communication by regulatory bodies and the supply of information to underpin consumer confidence.
* Recognition gene technology involves significant issues of intellectual property and the need to ensure this property is protected globally.
Gene technology is an area where emotion often beats science. This policy rightly recognises the need for regulation, safeguards and communication.
* Recognition of the property rights of affected land owners and lease holders.
* Continuation of the Tenure Review process with objective evaluations of Significant Inherent Values (SIVs).
* More recognition given to the use of protective mechanisms for SIVs as provided for in the Crown Pastoral Land Act 1998 (CPLA).
* Where large areas of land have both productive and environmental values, greater use of ‘sustainable management covenants’ under freehold titles as provided for in the CPLA.
* Amenity values be excluded from pastoral lease rent reviews.
They’ve got my vote on all of these points which address areas where Labour has caused hassles and heartache.
* Recognition that farming is a skilled occupation by Immigration New Zealand.
* Increased flexibility in immigration policies.
* Inclusion of more farming categories on the occupational skills shortage list.
Immigration policy needs to acknowledge that overseas experience isn’t necessarily helpful here and that attitude and work ethics are often more important than relevant experience.
* Review of the Local Government Act 2002 and local government funding to define council core functions.
* Councils to be given the flexibility to decide representation arrangements.
* More consistency in the process of setting user charges (eg dog registration).
* Any changes to dog control laws not to impose unreasonable impositions and costs on responsible owners of farm working dogs.
Yes again to all of these points.