Cleaner without kids

You could almost feel sorry for the Green Party over the reaction to their population policy.

Except that like a lot of other Green initiatives, in spite of no doubt worthy intentions, it’s got lots of fish hooks and I’ll confess one of the reasons I took the bait was because it reminded me of the campaign by green (though not necessarily Green) people against disposable napkins.

Let me start with a confession: I used disposable nappies.

 When I say used I don’t mean wore because I don’t think they were invented until I was long past needing them. What I mean is, I used them for my children.

In mitigation I’ll add that for the first two it was only when we went out that I exchanged reusable cloth nappies for the convenience of disposables. With the third it was necessity which persuaded me to give up on the cotton ones because he had a brain disorder. That left him incontinent and by the time he was two the old cloth and safety pins just couldn’t cope with his bowel and bladder capacity so I turned to disposables which could.

Napkins are one of the things people like to kid you about when you’re pregnant but once the baby arrives you just do what has to be done with them and I never considered that to be worthy of debate.

However, that was before I came across no fewer than five separate articles in the space of a few weeks which did their best to convince me otherwise.

By the time I got to the end of the fifth diatribe I was beginning to think that choosing to drape my babies’ bottoms in disposables I was commiting a major crime against the environment.

My conscience was eased a little by a single contribution of the contrary viewpoint which sought to convince me that with everything involved in growing, harvesting and processing the cotton and turning it into napkins plus the water, power and soap powder used in washing them, cloth nappies might be even less kind on the environment that disposables.

However, my relief was short lived because these counter-arguments were made by a representative of the company which makes disposables and while I didn’t doubt his sincerity I couldn’t ignore the suspicion that the claims he made could be influenced to some degree by self-interest.

But even if he was biased, there was still some truth in the environmental impact of cloth nappies so either way I couldn’t win.

If I used reusables I wasted natural resources but so did disposables and that also left the problem of disposal because in spite of what their name implies one of the problems with disposables is their disposability, or lack of it.

Not that I ever thought about such things when deciding which nappies to use because whether I used cloth or disposables had nothing to do with the environment and everything to do with my children’s comfort and my convenience.

Once my son died I no longer had to worry about napkins, but the arguments are still raging – and each time I come across them I wonder if they do because it is women who are still much more likely to be involved in the purchase, use, laundering or disposal of napkins? Isn’t there something predominantly used by men which is equally problematic?

Obviously the environment would be better off without any napkins but until someone designs people who are born with the control which makes them unnecessary maybe anyone with the best interests of a clean, green world at heart would just be better not to have babies at all.

5 Responses to Cleaner without kids

  1. bobux says:

    Err, no.

    They released an offensive lame-brained policy, and have been ridiculed for it. I don’t feel sorry for them in the slightest.


  2. homepaddock says:

    Bobux – I did say almost 🙂


  3. Colin Lucas says:

    I think that the Green Policy is probably the lamest thing they have come up with in quite a while and that is in an outstanding field of lame ideas.

    It is also a serious vote loser. I thought eugenics was something only the Nazis looked at, but given the Greens are Nazis in disguise why am I surprised.

    As to the disposable vs cloth debate. My wife and I have two cildren under 3.5 years. Quite frankly the opportunity cost of disposables won over the “environmental” cost of cloth (my wife’s sanity to be precise).

    Even though we have just emerged from the tunnel of toilet training so nappies are no longer needed for number one I doubt that there will be a change to cloth simply for convienience.


  4. All my mates kids were straight to disposables, with one exception. They took two months of washing nappies until converting. Instead of imposing their will on prospective voters, the Greens should learn the self-discipline of, for example, Akido. Roll with it.

    The disposable nappy dilemma, and the guilt trip on Soccer Mums that results, leaves a huge niche market for the nappy pushers. Design a fully biodegradable nappy that can be disposed of safely in compost patches.


  5. exexpat says:

    My mother never used cloth nappies with any of her three kids .Her reasoning was 1) too much work and 2) she had a irrational fear of finding one of her toddler drowning in a nappy pail.

    I remember when she had my brother (ten year age gap) the nurses were actually telling her off because she had three kids but couldn’t use a cloth nappy if her life depended on it.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: