Why is she doing it?

Until recently I would have said Helen Clark was a very clever political strategist. But her handling of Winston Peters and the donation debacle has proved me wrong.

By sticking with him she’s losing ground on two fronts by providing ammunition for her opponents and turning off her supporters.

She won’t care what people like me think because I’m never going to vote for her. But she ought to care about people like Deborah at In A Strange Land.

Her post is worth reading in full but I’ll just copy the intro and conclusion:

Forgive me, Helen. Although I like to characterise myself as a swinging voter, in practice, every election I have voted in, except my very first, I have voted Labour, even if at times through gritted teeth.

But if you want to campaign on trust, then you need to rule out working with Winston Peters. . .

. . . But until Labour explicitly rules out working with Winston Peters and New Zealand First, I will be looking for some other party to give my vote to. Until then, I can’t trust you to do the right thing.

Update: I’ve been thinking more about this over lunch, and I think that what is upsetting me so much is that Labour is inviting me to be complicit in their “courageous corruption.” We all know pollies lie, but rarely is it so obvious, and so self-serving, as has been in the case of Winston Peters. It all stinks to high heaven, and then some. By not ruling him out, and still asking me to vote for them, at best Helen Clark and Labour are asking me to block my nose, to pretend that the stench isn’t there. But more realistically, they are asking me to buy the stink in order to have a Labour government. “That’s just what it costs,” they are telling me.

Quite simply, I refuse to pay the price. I will not collude in returning Winston Peters to influence in any government.

So why is she doing it?

Has she lost her strategic nous; doesn’t she realise how far she’s stretching the loyalty of her supporters; is she so desperate for power she’s prepared to overlook anything Peters has done?

Or does she simply not think that integrity matters?

5 Responses to Why is she doing it?

  1. Andrew W says:

    Or does Winston actually have some dirt on her? Normally I would dismiss such a suggestion out of hand, but with her single mineded determination to protect him, despite the illogic of that protection, I think we’re getting to the stage of: “Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.”


  2. homepaddock says:

    Andrew – very good point.


  3. […] has an interesting post titled ‘Why is she doing it’ about one Helen Clark and her dogged defence of one Winston […]


  4. Ramsay says:

    I agree with Andrew. Peters must have some sort of hold over Clark. Why is the MSM too gutless to put this suggestion out there. She has demoted a raft of Ministers for lesser “crimes” than Peters committed.

    What does Peters know that Clark does not want us mere mortals to discover???


  5. […] Tip: Homepaddock Tags: Election 2008, Labour, Winston […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: