SFO to investigate Peters

He asked the Serious Fraud Office to put up or shut up and go away – and they’re going to do the former.

The Serious Fraud Office has decided to launch a full investigation into Winston Peters, and will use its powers to find out whether donations from Sir Robert Jones and the Vela brothers reached his New Zealand First party as intended.

SFO Director Grant Liddell said he had enough information to suspect the investigation may reveal “serious and complex fraud” the threshold for the statutory powers which can force documents to be produced or people involved to answer questions.

Mr Liddell has been assessing a complaint from Act leader Rodney Hide for the past month.

He said he did not believe there was enough evidence to use the SFO powers on the Owen Glenn donation, because it was clear from both men’s accounts the money was donated to Mr Peters’ legal costs.

And while the allegations concerning the scampi select committee were serious, Mr Liddell said “seriousness of allegation alone is not enough”.

He said it may be that further information was uncovered on these allegations that gave him “reason to suspect” and use the powers.

Keep in mind though, as Matthew Hooton pointed out on The Panel  this afternoon that legislation abolishing the SFO is pending; and that if an election was called the priviliges committee would go too.

But even Helen Clark wouldn’t rush through the legislation then call the election so that both inquiries were aborted, would she?

4 Responses to SFO to investigate Peters

  1. dave says:

    To answer your last question , no, they’ll delay the SFO legislation.


  2. Ed Snack says:

    Dave, I believe you are naive, of course “they” would.


  3. JC says:

    Don’t forget the investigation is against NZ1st, not Winston. Clark may use this as an excuse to not stand him down tomorrow.



  4. Ed Snack says:

    I now find (and I am glad so to find) that my cynicism got the better of me, the SFO legislation has been deferred whilst this investigation is underway.

    Dave, my apologies, that was always the realistic view. To date my cynical view that one could only go wrong by assuming that there was some moral content to their actions was providing an excellent guide to how this has developed.

    I’m still picking Winston to survive until next Wednesday and the passing of the ETS, but I am less definite on that now.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: