The Southland Times editorial commends Basil Walker of Queenstown who has been granted a High Court hearing on September 22 against the entire Labour caucus.
His beef with them is the apparent lack of scientific evidence supporting the Government’s move to enact the emissions trading scheme.
He sees the proposed legislation as ill-founded and is determined to prevent it being made law before the general election this year. The Government is trying to force expensive legislation on the country and someone has to stand up and say there is no evidence to support it, he says.
Much of his argument is based on the work of two men: former Thatcher adviser Lord Monkton and scientist David Evans.
Lord Monkton picks something like 35 significant holes in the global warming debate raised by Al Gore’s movie An Inconvenient Truth. Some of these have been supported by a High Court judge in the United Kingdom.
Dr Evans developed the carbon accounting model that measures Australia’s compliance with the Kyoto Protocol.
“When I started that job in 1999 the evidence that carbon emissions caused global warming seemed pretty good,” he said in a paper this year. “The evidence was not conclusive, but why wait until we were certain when it appeared we needed to act quickly?” Since then new evidence had seriously weakened the case and by 2007 it was “pretty conclusive” carbon played only a minor role and was not the main cause of recent global warming.
That led Dr Evans to change his opinion, adding that the lack of public debate about the causes of global warming meant people were not aware of some basic facts: wThe greenhouse signature — which would prove the greenhouse effect — was missing.
- There was no evidence carbon emissions caused significant global warming.
- Satellite data showed the warming trend ended in 2001 and the world was cooling.
- Ice core data showed global temperatures rose around 800 years before the accompanying rise in atmospheric carbon.
This created a greater urgency than ever to get answers, he said.
That’s a compelling argument for Mr Walker. He doesn’t know the answers, he says, but neither has the Government supplied any solid evidence to prove the emissions scheme is needed.
Our Queenstown battler is going to struggle to reach his goal on this one, but at least he’s fighting. How many of us can honestly say that?
I don’t know whether or not the world is warming and whether or not people are causing it. But I am certain that Labour’s proposed Emissions Trading Scheme will not help the environment and will do great harm to the economy.
The Hive reckons that Labour has the numbers to pass the ETS and Keeping Stock notes this shows labour hasn’t learned from the mistake of rushing through the Electoral Finance Act and wonders what deals have been done to get the legislation through so the legal action is timely.
Regardless of the merits of his case, if it delays the passing of the ETS until after the election when the whole matter can be given the proper consideration it needs, Mr Walker will have done us all a favour.
Good on ya mate :)