The first topic of discussion on Afternoon’s Panel on Tuesday was Paula Bennett’s proposals for countering the scourge of child abuse.
One of the panelists, Gary McCormick, asserted that the root cause of the problem was poverty (starting at about 9:01).
Host Jim Mora said there was disagreement about the extent to which poverty is related to child abuse.
Guest Anthea Simcock from Child Matters then came on (about 12 minutes) and said while poverty was related to the issues it was not the primary cause and child abuse wouldn’t be fixed by fixing poverty alone.
McCormick came back in (13:56) and told her she was wrong and poverty was the cause of the problems.
She countered that by saying it was a co-existing factor but not a causal one.
He came back and eventually said he refused to believe what she was saying.
This is a prime example of someone not letting the facts getting in the way of their convictions and he’s not the only one.
John Minto says that Labour needs “a kick up the backside” for not pushing the message that poverty is the “key factor” behind child abuse.
He says there are NEVER any excuses for child abuse but there are REASONS behind it.
Unfortunately reasons becomes excuses very easily.
Can I take you back to just a couple of things that people like John Minto ignore.
Child abuse rates are not high amongst all groups with high poverty rates. In fact they are lower amongst poor Asians.
Household incomes of Maori and Pacific families are growing faster than the median, yet the rate of Maori child abuse is not declining. . .
Poverty is a problem but a lot of very poor people love and care for their children and some who aren’t poor abuse them.
The problems of poverty and child abuse both need to be addressed but it is wrong to assert that solving the former will solve the latter.