The commentary on births and deaths in the year to the end of September records a decline in infant mortality and still births:
During the September 2009 year, the number of infant deaths (under one year of age) registered in New Zealand totalled 290. The infant mortality rate (infant deaths per 1,000 live births) has dropped over the last 40 years. In the September 2009 year, the infant mortality rate was 4.5 per 1,000, down from 5.5 in the September 1999 year, and 17.6 in 1969. The Māori infant mortality rate was 6.2 per 1,000 in the September 2009 year, down from 23.0 in 1969.

Neonatal deaths (under four weeks of age) made up 55 percent of infant deaths in the September 2009 year. The neonatal mortality rate (neonatal deaths per 1,000 live births) was 2.5 in 2009, down from 2.9 in 1999. The post-neonatal mortality rate (infant deaths over 27 days of age per 1,000 live births) also dropped, from 2.6 in 1999, to 2.1 per 1,000 in 2009.
Australia has also experienced a drop in infant mortality rates in the last decade. In the December 1997 year, New Zealand’s infant mortality rate was 6.5 per 1,000 live births, compared with 5.3 per 1,000 in Australia. By 2007, New Zealand’s infant mortality rate had dropped to 4.9 per 1,000 and Australia’s rate had dropped to 4.2 per 1,000. (The 2007 data is the most recent available for Australia.)
Scotland (4.7 per 1,000 live births), and England and Wales (4.8) had similar infant mortality rates to New Zealand’s in 2007. However, a number of other low-fertility countries had lower infant mortality rates: Sweden (2.2), Finland (2.7), Norway (3.1), France (3.6), and Denmark (4.0).
There were 380 stillbirths in the September 2009 year. This corresponds to 6.0 stillbirths per 1,000 births (live and stillbirths combined).
The sharp decline in infant mortality is encouraging, but I am left with a question – how many of the babies who survived received some sort of damage during birth which left them with a disability?
These stats are for births and deaths so there is nothing untoward about the absence of any records of babies who were damaged during birth and survived, here.
But those numbers ought to be recorded somewhere and readily available and they don’t appear to be.
The optimum outcome of pregnancy is not just a live birth but a healthy baby.
There are growing concerns about our maternity system. The trend in the number of babies who are damaged during birth but survive would be one measure of whether or not these concerns are justified.