Owen Glenn has told the privileges committee that Winston Peters asked him for money.
Peters disputes that.
Kathryn Ryan is discussing this with Radio NZ political editor Brent Edwards as I type. It will be on line here later.
There is no doubt there are enough allegations swirling round Peters now for him to have been relieved of his ministerial responsibilities had he been a Labour MP. The need for New Zealand First’s votes has stayed Helen Clark’s hand until now. but the mud which is being thrown at Peters will bog her down too if she allows this to go on much longer.
The allegations are still allegations and Peters maintains they’re wrong but the mud which is being thrown at Peters will bog Clark and Labour down too if she allows this to go on much longer.
Update: The Roarprawn has pointed me at the text of Glenn’s letter which says:
“The payment was made by me to assist funding the legal costs incurred personally by Rt Hon Winston Peters MP concerning his election petition dispute, at his request.
” Mr Peters sought help from me for this purpose in a personal conversation, some time after I had first met him in Sydney.
“I agreed to help in the belief that this step would also assist the Labour Party in its relationship with Mr Peters. I supported the Labour Party.”
Mr Glenn said the conversation had occurred “some time after I had first met him in Sydney” and he had authorised the payment on or about December 20, 2005.
He said Mr Peters had then thanked him at the Karaka yearling sales in early 2006. He did not believe he had ever met or spoken to Mr Henry.
In response Peters says:
… Mr Glenn’s assertion he had personally requested money “does not coincide with my recollections” and he said he believed the “personal conversation” referred to by Mr Glenn was one he had held with Mr Henry.
He also said he believed he had seen Mr Glenn while the two lunched at the same table at the 2007 Karaka sales, rather than in 2006.
Mr Peters said he had not thanked him until after Mr Henry advised him of the payment on July 18.
In response to that we have a contender for the award for stating the obvious:
Committee chairman Simon Power today said the two statements were inconsistent.
August 27, 2008 at 10:42 am
It’s pretty obvious who Busted Blonde (the roarprawn) is.
I sat next to her at various meetings of the Scampi Inquiry.
She even bought me a seafood lunch at Shed 5!